ISSN: 0320-8095
ISSN: 0320-8095
En Ru
Russian Freemasonry in China in the First Half of the Twentieth Century

Russian Freemasonry in China in the First Half of the Twentieth Century

Article in Elibrary

Received: 11/21/2022

Accepted: 11/25/2022

Keywords: China Freemasonry; Russian Diaspora in Harbin; Roerichism; ideological discussions

To cite this article

Alexey A. Maslov Russian Freemasonry in China in the First Half of the Twentieth Century. // Lomonosov Oriental Studies Journal. 2022. N 4, p.3–19

N 4, 2022

Abstract

Russian Freemasonry in China - an extremely interesting phenomenon, it was markedly different from the Masonic lodges of the Western Diaspora of Shanghai, Beijing, Tianjin, Hong Kong. There was no specific “Russian” Masonic lodge in China, Freemasonry among the natives of Russia in the 1920-1930's turned into an arena of political struggle and mutual accusations, the opposition of conservative, monarchist, socialist and other ideas. It also turned out to be closely connected with moral and esoteric quests, intertwined with Roerichism and mysticism. Another feature was that, unlike Westerners, Russian Freemasons have never raised the question of the possibility of participation of the Chinese in the activities of the lodges, or on cooperation with the Chinese administration. Russian Freemasonry and the parallel anti-Masonic movement lived their own, active, but closed life. Accusations of Freemasonry were a traditional way of settling scores between various Russian groups, and the term “Freemason” became a formula for accusations of the worst sins. The Sungari Lodge in Harbin was founded on the wave of the opening of new Masonic organizations across northeast China on July 5, 1928, and operated for twelve years. In opposition to Freemasonry among the Western diaspora, which was not painful to discuss, was not politicized and did not serve as an arena for clashes between various groups, Russian Freemasonry in China was closely related to the search for new meanings of transformation of society, the discovery of “friends” and “enemies”, and it reflected the deep debate in the Russian émigré environment.