ISSN: 0320-8095
ISSN: 0320-8095
En Ru
From frontier to strategic buffer: the North-Eastern borderland of India in Olaf Caroe’s plans during the Second World War

From frontier to strategic buffer: the North-Eastern borderland of India in Olaf Caroe’s plans during the Second World War

Article in Elibrary

Received: 04/15/2026

Accepted: 05/28/2026

Published: 07/02/2026

Keywords: North-East India, Olaf Caroe, frontier, border, buffer, strategic planning, Second World War

Available in the on-line version with: 26.08.2026

To cite this article

Savishcheva M.D. From frontier to strategic buffer: the North-Eastern borderland of India in Olaf Caroe’s plans during the Second World War. // Lomonosov Oriental Studies Journal. 2026. Vol. 70. N 2,70 p.3-20 https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0320-8095-13-70-2-1.

N 2, 2026

Abstract

The article analyzes the views of the British colonial administration on the security system along the north-eastern borderland of India during the Second World War. It examines strategic projects developed by British officials in the early 1940s in the context of the Japanese advance in Burma and the reconsideration of the region’s future political and strategic configuration. Particular attention is paid to the concept of the “two rings of buffers” proposed by Foreign Secretary to the Government of India Olaf Caroe, according to which the defence of India in the North-East was to be based on a combination of an external belt of buffer states (primarily Tibet and Burma) and an internal defensive zone composed of the tribal areas of the North-East Frontier of India. The article shows that in British strategic planning of that period, the North-East gradually acquired increasing importance in the context of possible external threats to India’s security, the most significant of which was perceived to be the potential rise of China. At the same time, the political developments of the mid-1940s and the preparations for granting independence to India prevented the implementation of plans for the reorganization of the northeastern borderland, many of which remained at the level of strategic proposals.

References

  1. Mills Ch.R. Vlastvuyushchaya elita [The Power Elite]. Translated from English by E.I. Rozental, L.G. Roshal, V.L. Kon. Moscow, Direkt-Media Publ., 2007. (In Russ.)

  2. Savishcheva M.D. Vossozdavaya zabytyy rubezh: liniya Makmagona v britanskoy politike v Indii v 1930–1940-e gody [Reconstructing a Forgotten Frontier: The McMahon Line in British Policy in India in the 1930s–1940s]. Vostok. Afro-aziatskie obshchestva: istoriya i sovremennost’ [Vostok (Oriens). Afro-Asian Societies: History and Modernity], 2025, no. 6, pp. 61–72. (In Russ.)

  3. Yurlov F.N., Yurlova E.S. Istoriya Indii. XX vek [History of India. The 20th Century]. Moscow, Institute of Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, 2010. (In Russ.)

  4. Baruah S. The Mongolian Fringe. Himal Southasian, 2013, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 82–86.

  5. Boulding K.E. Conflict and Defense: A General Theory. New York, Harper Torchbooks, 1963.

  6. Brobst P.J. The Future of the Great Game: Sir Olaf Caroe, India’s Independence, and the Defence of Asia. Akron, University of Akron Press, 2005.

  7. Choudhury D.P. British Policy on the North-East Frontier of India, 1865–1914. PhD thesis. London, SOAS, University of London, 1970.

  8. Guyot-Réchard B. Shadow States: India, China and the Himalayas, 1910–1962. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2017.

  9. Guyot-Réchard B. Tangled Lands: Burma and India’s Unfinished Separation, 1937–1948. The Journal of Asian Studies, 2020, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 1–23.

  10. Leake E. Where National and International Meet: Borders and Border Regions in Postcolonial India. The International History Review, 2022, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 856–873.

  11. O’Tuathail G. Critical Geopolitics: The Politics of Writing Global Space. Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota Press, 1996.

  12. Woodman D. Himalayan Frontiers: A Political Review of British, Chinese, Indian and Russian Rivalries. London, Barrie and Rockliff; Cresset Press, 1969.

  13. A Post-War Security System for the Indian Ocean, memorandum by H.V. Hodson, 1942. India Office Records (IOR). Political and Secret Department. IOR/L/P&S/12/724. British Library, London.

  14. Bell C.A. Tibet: Past and Present. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1924.

  15. Caroe O. Note on Assam–Burma Boundary, 1 November 1944. India Office Records (IOR). Political and Secret Department. IOR/L/P&S/12/3115A. British Library, London.

  16. Caroe O. Note, 26 July 1943. India Office Records (IOR). Political and Secret Department. IOR/L/P&S/12/3115A. British Library, London.

  17. Caroe O. Problems of Power Confrontation in Inner Asia. Journal of the Royal Central Asian Society, 1969, vol. 56, pt. 3–4, pp. 247–255.

  18. Caroe O. Some Political and Constitutional Reflections on the Landward Security of the India of the Future, memorandum, 18 August 1944. India Office Records (IOR). Political and Secret Department. IOR/L/P&S/12/727. British Library, London.

  19. Caroe O. The Buffer States: Their Historic Service to Peace. The Round Table, 1955, no. 180, pp. 335–343.

  20. Caroe O. The Sino-Indian Frontier Dispute. Asian Review, 1963, vol. 59, no. 78 (218), April.

  21. Caroe O. to Peel W. Letter, 26 August 1944. India Office Records (IOR). Political and Secret Department. IOR/L/P&S/12/727. British Library, London.

  22. Caroe to the Under-Secretary of State for India, 28 June 1935. India Office Records (IOR). Political and Secret Department. IOR/L/P&S/12/4175. British Library, London.

  23. Correspondence between O. Caroe and W. Peel, 11 October 1943. India Office Records (IOR). London Records of the India Office. Political and Secret Department (P&S). File 12/3115A. British Library, London.

  24. External Affairs Department, Government of India, to the Secretary of State for India, 2 May 1944. India Office Records (IOR). War Staff Papers. IOR/L/WS/1/1340. British Library, London.

  25. Menon V.P. to Caroe O. Letter, 7 August 1943. India Office Records (IOR). Political and Secret Department. IOR/L/P&S/12/3115A. British Library, London.

  26. Mills J.P. A Note on the Future of the Hill Tribes of Assam and the Adjoining Hills in a Self-Governing India, September 1945. British Library: Asian and African Studies. MSS Eur F236/357.

  27. Mills J.P. Note to Clow, 13 March 1944. Government of India. External Affairs Department. File No. 238-C.A./45. National Archives of India, New Delhi.

  28. Minutes of Discussion, Viceroy’s Study Group, 23 September 1942. India Office Records (IOR). Political and Secret Department. IOR/L/P&S/12/725. British Library, London.

  29. Note by G.N. Molesworth, 23 October 1944. India Office Records (IOR). War Staff Papers. IOR/L/WS/1/1340. British Library, London.

  30. Reid R. A Note on the Future of the Present Excluded, Partially Excluded and Tribal Areas of Assam. 1942. British Library, Asian and African Studies. London. Reid Collection. MSS Eur E 278/4.

  31. Reid R. Note on the Excluded Areas of Assam, 20 May 1938. Government of India. External Affairs Department. External, No. 56-X/1938. National Archives of India, New Delhi.

  32. Reid R. The Excluded Areas of Assam. The Geographical Journal, 1944, vol. 103, no. 1–2, pp. 18–29.

  33. Secretary of State for India to the Viceroy, 19 August 1942. India Office Records (IOR). Political and Secret Department. IOR/L/P&S/12/724. British Library, London.

  34. The Future of War and the Future of an Army, memorandum by F. Tucker, December 1944. India Office Records (IOR). Political and Secret Department. IOR/L/P&S/12/730B. British Library, London.

  35. Viceroy of India to the Secretary of State for India, 13 July 1942. India Office Records (IOR). Political and Secret Department. IOR/L/P&S/12/724. British Library, London.

  36. Wavell to Caroe, 20 March 1944. India Office Records (IOR). Political and Secret Department. IOR/L/P&S/12/724. British Library, London.